| [NEWS] Silly Logo Design - Click HERE for Original Thread |
| oldraven |
"...it is not inappropriate to an organisation that’s looking to have a firm grip on Government spend."
:lol:
"The logo, for the Office of Government Commerce, was intended to signify a bold commitment to the body’s aim of “improving value for money by driving up standards and capability in procurement”."
:blink: Value for money? It cost then $28G to squeeze three letters closer together. Subliminal proof that they were fucking the dog. |
|
|
| Graphicdude |
28Grand for that?! Jesus, I could have designed something for them for 1/8 the price. It truly amazes me how people think that by dumping in tons of money on something, they automatically assume it will be the best ever.
Being a Graphic Designer myself, that logo sucks and is a cop out. I am confused and I would have liked to have seen all of their roughs and sketches that they came up with before they decided to burn them all and go for this idea.
Fuck me that is one of the most horrible money loosing pieces of shit I have ever seen. Concept?! What fucking concept?!
"The logo, for the Office of Government Commerce, was intended to signify a bold commitment to the body’s aim of “improving value for money by driving up standards and capability in procurement"
W-T-F!!! By bolding a type face and squeezing it together you get that?! Jesus christ, if this came from some bigtime Studio, they need a bitch slap and should be embarrassed of themselves.
It is truly inspiring though. It inspires me to know that I can design something better than a bigtime Studio and that if I play my cards right I could retire in a year by charging 28 Grand a logo. :mad: |
|
|
| Jord@n |
quote:
Originally posted by Graphicdude
28Grand for that?! Jesus, I could have designed something for them for 1/8 the price. It truly amazes me how people think that by dumping in tons of money on something, they automatically assume it will be the best ever.
Being a Graphic Designer myself, that logo sucks and is a cop out. I am confused and I would have liked to have seen all of their roughs and sketches that they came up with before they decided to burn them all and go for this idea.
Fuck me that is one of the most horrible money loosing pieces of shit I have ever seen. Concept?! What fucking concept?!
"The logo, for the Office of Government Commerce, was intended to signify a bold commitment to the body’s aim of “improving value for money by driving up standards and capability in procurement"
W-T-F!!! By bolding a type face and squeezing it together you get that?! Jesus christ, if this came from some bigtime Studio, they need a bitch slap and should be embarrassed of themselves.
It is truly inspiring though. It inspires me to know that I can design something better than a bigtime Studio and that if I play my cards right I could retire in a year by charging 28 Grand a logo. :mad:
The thing about graphic design is it's not always about the complexity and flash in creating a logo that is suitable for an organizations needs/wants. :p |
|
|
| Graphicdude |
| True but to pay 28 Gs for that?! In my books 28 Gs would be for a hell of a lot of research and roughs and one KICK ASS concept. Not a typographical logo trying to pretend that there is a concept behind it. |
|
|
| unlimited |
| im not sure where, but that logo looks like some clothing brand. cant remember the name bu tit looked almost like that. two Cs intertwined or something. |
|
|
| Prudz_lude |
| :lol: :lol: he is jerking it |
|
|
| Twigs_Dee |
| I dont see OGC mouse pads on ebay yet :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :dunno: |
|
|
| samurai_x |
Wanking it...
I think they are encouraging Prostate Cancer Prevention..
You know what they say "A Wank a Day Keeps the Wood at Bay" |
|
|
| RSN CRX |
| That logo looks like the clothing brand name UGG. |
|
|
|
|
|
